homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.62.132
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: phranque

Webmaster General Forum

    
No cache
Is there a benefit to this?
Jhet




msg:3194995
 8:08 pm on Dec 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Is there an SEO benefit to having your pages not cached in the search engines? Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

 

Mathieu Bonnet




msg:3195971
 3:56 pm on Dec 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

>
> Is there an SEO benefit to having your pages not cached in the search
> engines? Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
>

Are you thinking about something specific?

From the usability standpoint, having your page cached generally means faster access (and simply an access, if you website is temporarily -or permanently-, down), for advanced users... and if a user find what he wants, on your website, he might come back.

The majority of users, however, might not even know what it is about (well, some might have already heard people talking about it, on forums/blogs), and will generally not follow the "Cached" links.

For pure search engine optimization (better indexing), I don't think it is taken into account by any search engine... they will still index your website as regularly, and I don't think they would make websites "lose points", because they requested the engine, not to archive them... (well, I never read anything about it, anyway, and it would not make much sense).

This said, disabling archiving, means your website will not be indexed by archive websites, like archive.org, which might be yet another point of entry, to your website (and would permit users to see "how your website looked before", in a few years... -which adds a bit of community feeling).

Now, it depends what kind of website you are publishing...

Jhet




msg:3196062
 4:53 pm on Dec 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

We have hired an SEO firm and this was one of their suggestions. Their reasoning behind this is that it forces the SE's to re-evaluate the pages every time the bot visits and the algorithm runs.

I can't see how it would be of benefit. Does it really matter if Google does not show a link to a cached copy of your site in the serps? If it had a positive impact on rankings I would imagine that every site out there would not allow the SE to cache their sites.

paladin




msg:3196190
 5:37 pm on Dec 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

It sound like your SEO firm is wrong.

Take a look at what Google has to say about it: [google.com...]

Make sure your web server supports the If-Modified-Since HTTP header. This feature allows your web server to tell Google whether your content has changed since we last crawled your site. Supporting this feature saves you bandwidth and overhead.

Jhet




msg:3196272
 6:26 pm on Dec 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

Does anyone know if Google still saves a copy of the webpage for rank determination even if you use the no-cache meta tag? Or does Google even use the cached pages for anything?

Thank you paladin.

[edited by: Jhet at 6:35 pm (utc) on Dec. 21, 2006]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved