|Hackers May Have 250,000 Twitter Accounts Usernames and Passwords|
| 9:10 am on Feb 2, 2013 (gmt 0)|
|As you may have read, there’s been a recent uptick in large-scale security attacks aimed at U.S. technology and media companies. Within the last two weeks, the New York Times and Wall Street Journal have chronicled breaches of their systems, and Apple and Mozilla have turned off Java by default in their browsers. |
This week, we detected unusual access patterns that led to us identifying unauthorized access attempts to Twitter user data. We discovered one live attack and were able to shut it down in process moments later. However, our investigation has thus far indicated that the attackers may have had access to limited user information – usernames, email addresses, session tokens and encrypted/salted versions of passwords – for approximately 250,000 users.Hackers May Have 250,000 Twitter Accounts Usernames and Passwords [blog.twitter.com]
| 10:59 am on Feb 2, 2013 (gmt 0)|
The hackers must have seen that Twitter is nearing $10 billion in value and wanted to get in on the action.
| 10:27 pm on Feb 2, 2013 (gmt 0)|
They are hoping to find links (passwords and logins ) to other important services
| 10:37 pm on Feb 2, 2013 (gmt 0)|
I thought my Twitter account was hacked about 4 months ago and I changed my password to something I can't even remember. Now I'm glad I did that, as I don't use that password anywhere else. I wrote that password down... now that I'm thinking about it, I'm going to go change my facebook password to something crazy too, it's not a very strong password at the moment :-)
| 10:45 pm on Feb 2, 2013 (gmt 0)|
If twitter would use two step authentication like google does we wouldn't have issues like this,,,at least not as often.
| 11:44 pm on Feb 2, 2013 (gmt 0)|
|I changed my password to something I can't even remember. Now I'm glad I did that, as I don't use that password anywhere else. |
Yes, that's the important takeaway from this. Sadly, we almost have to assume a certain percentage of our passwords being compromised.
| 7:50 am on Feb 3, 2013 (gmt 0)|
I've known Twitter wasn't secure for over two years now. How? Because I have a barely used account and about once a month I was seeing someone add themselves to my follow list, even though I never followed them. Every single time it happened their profile would show the little lock symbol so that anyone else following me could not see them.
I contacted twitter about it, no response.
| 8:30 am on Feb 3, 2013 (gmt 0)|
|'ve known Twitter wasn't secure... |
Just because bots follow you doesn't make twitter insecure, it makes it spammy.
| 8:12 am on Feb 4, 2013 (gmt 0)|
|If twitter would use two step authentication like google does we wouldn't have issues like this,,,at least not as often |
Hardly. Your Twitter account isn't the important thing here. What is important, as was mentioned above, is that many/most people use the same credentials for multiple services. If hackers get a password for any given user, chances are that password is also used for other things (email accounts, e-commerce accounts, bank accounts, etc).
However, reading the article itself suggests that users were not the actual target here, but the organisation. In which case, 2-step wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference either.
| 12:28 pm on Feb 4, 2013 (gmt 0)|
The list of usernames and passwords is yet to appear on any of the torrent sites or the file download sites, basically the usual suspect places where stolen data is posted by the thieves.
Would be nice to see how many of the 250K users were using "password" as their password assuming that the hackers will succeed in decrypting the passwords.
| 6:28 pm on Feb 4, 2013 (gmt 0)|
I guess this is further confirmation that maddeningly slow sites don't necessarily equal secure sites. Even my bank's site is much faster.