homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.163.89.8
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Social Media / Twitter
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: not2easy & rumbas

Twitter Forum

    
Twitter Can Now Withhold Content From Users In A Specific Country
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 10:46 am on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

Twitter Can Now Withhold Content From Users In A Specific Country [blog.twitter.com]
Until now, the only way we could take account of those countries’ limits was to remove content globally. Starting today, we give ourselves the ability to reactively withhold content from users in a specific country — while keeping it available in the rest of the world. We have also built in a way to communicate transparently to users when content is withheld, and why.

We haven’t yet used this ability, but if and when we are required to withhold a Tweet in a specific country, we will attempt to let the user know, and we will clearly mark when the content has been withheld.

 

Brett_Tabke

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 3:02 pm on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

I can't understand why this news everywhere. IP filtering is so 15 years ago.

engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 3:23 pm on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

It's the principle of the filtering, or censoring, which is the key factor here, not the technical aspect.

Marshall

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 3:25 pm on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

Where laws are less than specific, e.g. Germany and banning pro-Nazi material, who decides what is to be withheld? Seems like a potential slippery slope.

Marshall

Samizdata

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 3:28 pm on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

Journalists and rabble-rousers have little interest in technology itself.

But they always find "censorship" a sexy subject.

...

Sgt_Kickaxe

WebmasterWorld Senior Member sgt_kickaxe us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 3:42 pm on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

Bypass PIPA and SOPA altogether and go for plain censorship without rules, why not. I'd be upset, if I used twitter, to know someone is arbitrarily hiding my tweets.

Spinning new censorship power as "less censorship" = priceless. Hopefully the censorship is never applied in the country the tweet originates from.

tangor

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 9:48 pm on Jan 27, 2012 (gmt 0)

Starting today, we give ourselves the ability to reactively withhold content from users in a specific country — while keeping it available in the rest of the world. We have also built in a way to communicate transparently to users when content is withheld, and why.

With those words earlier today, in a blog posting titled “Tweets still must flow” the management of Twitter went over to the dark side and may well have dug their own grave.

In what can only have been a fit of corporate insanity, Twitter announced that it has the ability to filter tweets to conform to the demands of various countries.

[forbes.com...]

We know these kinds of things are possible, but mainstream always falls behind... and by the time "they" hear about it... it is usually too little too late.

graeme_p

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 9:36 am on Jan 28, 2012 (gmt 0)

What alternative do they have? Otherwise they will be shut down, or completely blocked, sued, or even extradited and jailed.

Its not Twitter's fault, its the fault of insane laws, and the failure of democratic governments to protect free speech (I have to say one notable exception to this has been a recent US change, assuming it has passed into law, to protect its citizens from British libel law).

anshul

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 5:14 am on Jan 30, 2012 (gmt 0)

Journalists and rabble-rousers have little interest in technology itself.
Journalists may be having interests in technology and in freedom of expression or opinion. But governments and organisations are the ones who prefer to keep stagnancy and keep banning anything what that stirs movement of and flow of information and knowledge. Internet censorship is becoming common and dilute and they ban even anything whatever they want to. At least they should be a way to read censored content. Censorship is valid but need justification.

If I am posting something against the government or the organisation or against some eminent personality and they ban it then it hurts the freedom of expression. Still banning is critical as it may be required to ban #*$! and malicious content provoking terrorism or hatred.

What (they should) to ban and what not to ban is the root problem.

[edit: removed line-breaks]

Dijkgraaf

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 2:12 am on Jan 31, 2012 (gmt 0)

If twitter users start getting too many withheld messages they may decide that they need a new government.

anshul

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 2:14 pm on Feb 13, 2012 (gmt 0)

Twitter is banning already in India, I can't post some kind of tweets!

henry0

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 5:09 pm on Feb 13, 2012 (gmt 0)

tangor made an excellent remark:
and by the time "they" hear about it... it is usually too little too late.


In our days and ages we all know that viral effect could be almost instantaneously spontaneous, as such no one should really feel threatened.

The real danger will be filtering prior posting!

anallawalla

WebmasterWorld Administrator anallawalla us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4411425 posted 2:01 am on Feb 17, 2012 (gmt 0)

Anshul, Are those tweets rejected, or are they merely not visible to you but visible in other countries?

India is often touted as the world's largest democracy, but that doesn't imply it is a good democracy. [mashable.com ]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Social Media / Twitter
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved