homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Gold Sponsor 2015!
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / SEM Research Topics
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: phranque

SEM Research Topics Forum

what meta tags are legit?

10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3399473 posted 9:15 pm on Jul 19, 2007 (gmt 0)

I've been doing SEO work for several years, but due to time and budget constraints, I normally stick to using just the Meta keywords, description and robots tags. I've seen plenty of pages with additional meta tags that have always seemed fake, such as:

<meta name="revisit-after" content="1 day" underlyingmessage="pretty please">

Is there a confirmed list of legit (i.e. white hat) meta tags anywhere?




WebmasterWorld Senior Member jdmorgan us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3399473 posted 11:18 pm on Jul 19, 2007 (gmt 0)

Confirmed list? Whose would you trust? So let's start one...

The "revisit-after" metatag was a real tag -- For one small (Canadian, if I recall correctly) directory which disappeared long ago. But Webmasters and amateur SEOs so dearly wanted to believe in it that it was copied widely and spread like wildfire.

Can't speak for white-hats since I don't wear a hat, but I use only:

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-US">
<meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no">
<meta name="robots" content="noodp,noydir">
<meta name="keywords" content="widgets, wodgets, blodgers, golden snitches">
<meta name="description" content="Your best source of top-quality widgets within 120 parsecs! -- WidgetCo">
<meta name="copyright" content="All site contents copyright (C) 1996-2007 WidgetCo. All rights reserved.">
<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/x-icon" href="images/widgetco.ico">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="wcstyle.css">
<title>WidgetCo widgets -- Best widgets in the local galaxy group!</title>

Content-Type and Content-Language are only needed if you want to fully-support people saving/viewing your pages locally.

Keywords is almost useless, but still makes a small difference in some of the smaller search engines. Keep it short. Very.

Robots content is "index,follow" by default -- No need to include them. But "noODP" and "noYdir" can be used to prevent some SEs from using the ODP and Yahoo! Directory titles and descriptions if they are particularly bad, and "nocache" and "nosnippet" are ofen useful.


Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / SEM Research Topics
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved