homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.95.201
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mademetop

General Search Engine Marketing Issues Forum

    
Canonical Tag
Difference between noindex & canonical tag
MillieF




msg:4082457
 7:26 pm on Feb 17, 2010 (gmt 0)

I'm slightly mystified!

If I reproduce a piece of content on my site, e.g. I reproduce an article I'd published on another section of the site, but in the skin of the new section, I'd have duplicate content issues. So, to get over this, I noindex the duplicate content page.

Can anyone tell me the difference between the canonical tag and the use of noindex, especially as a page that contains the canonical tag is dropped from Google's index anyway?

 

TheMadScientist




msg:4082823
 8:15 am on Feb 18, 2010 (gmt 0)

A noindex tag removes the page from the index, but the canonical tag (in theory and IMO in practice definitely more than the noindex tag) consolidates link weight. A canonical tag is like an 'I can't do a 301 escape route' to say 'the page referenced in the canonical tag is where I would 301 if I could', while a noindex tag just says 'don't show the page in the results.'

MillieF




msg:4082832
 9:02 am on Feb 18, 2010 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the reply. But a page with a canonical tag doesn't make it into the index anyway I thought?

I can understand that pages already in existence need to transfer their PR, link value etc, but for brand new pages where you place duplicate content I fail to see the advantage of a canonical tag over a noindex.

Can you tell I'm confused? :-)

Adamus




msg:4083410
 11:46 am on Feb 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

"But a page with a canonical tag doesn't make it into the index anyway I thought?"

Quite the contrary. Pages with a canonical tag are more likely to end up in the index under that canonical URL. Without a canonical tag a search engine decides for itself which is the preferred version, which may not necessarily be what you prefer.

Personally I prefer not to use noindex tags, as I think I'd always prefer my content indexed as well as any links on the page. I use canonical URL tags to prevent duplicate content issues.

But if your noindex solution works fine for you, by all means stick with it.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved