| 12:38 pm on Jun 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
That url should be fine, its much better than one of those dynamic .com/?342432424blahblahblah kind of urls! If anything, the url is a little ugly, try adjusting the mod to use only the first 5 words of the title or something similar.
| 5:37 pm on Jun 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
The web page name is way, way too long and contains much too much repetition. Naming techniques like this inevitably prove useless in SEO (non-rewarded) because of the blatant overuse of keyword stuffing.
| 4:43 am on Jun 20, 2009 (gmt 0)|
i think google non index Url that.
now search Url so not show
| 5:16 am on Jun 20, 2009 (gmt 0)|
spama lama ding dong. That is a horribly spammy looking url.
If I saw that in the serps, I'd run the other direction. I'd take a shorter dynamic .com/?342432424blahblahblah over that as long as it didn't have more than a couple of variables an no session ids.
The best solution is to find a shorter version with no variables. I'm not worked with joomla, but I've been on joomla powered sites with much nicer urls.
| 6:20 am on Jun 20, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I've always gone for focus... that is, the shortest combination of identifiers for a URL to the document displayed. But I have to also admit I grew up on 8dot3 and it took another seven years for me to get on board with longer filenames. :)
| 11:48 pm on Jun 23, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I remember 8dot3 very very well. In fact I still don't use anyting beside a-z,0-9,-,_, and . in my file names on the web or my pc.
| 11:19 am on Jun 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Try to give your articles in Joomla shorter, unique titles and optimize your categories and sections.