| 1:03 pm on Apr 9, 2008 (gmt 0)|
it sounds like whoever setup your hosting created mirrors of your site at multiple locations. robots.txt will not help this situation since the robots.txt file will be copied to all the duplicate places. you should talk to your hosting person and explain that only one url should be indexed. they can make some changes to the hosting setup to deal with this situation.
as for duplicate content you should not have too big of an issue as long as you have all of your link popularity pointing to one version of the site. the engines will filter out the other duplicates.
| 1:39 pm on Apr 9, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Goodroi - thanks for your help!
| 12:01 am on Apr 10, 2008 (gmt 0)|
If you simply stop the alternative URLs working, you will lose that traffic.
You need a site-wide 301 redirect to fix this.
The redirect will preserve the traffic that comes in through the wrong URLs.
The 301 redirect will ensure that the wrong URLs are eventually de-indexed.
Ensure that all your internal linking points to the canonical domain.
| 6:39 am on Apr 10, 2008 (gmt 0)|
| 9:54 am on Apr 11, 2008 (gmt 0)|
| 8:52 am on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
I yesterday put a redirect from http://example.ie to http://www.example.ie as both were appearing in the search engines. A friend told me that these two sites, although the same will be competeing with each other and search engines might see them as duplicates.
I put a rewrite rule in my .htaccess file. Does anyone know if this will cause prolems?
[edited by: goodroi at 1:02 pm (utc) on April 16, 2008]
[edit reason] Examplified [/edit]
| 1:15 pm on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
welcome to webmasterworld. having the content accessible at both URLs can cause issues in the search engines. it is ideal to use a 301 redirect and point one of them into the other (which you have done). by redirecting you make sure the link popularity is focused and not divided. this also minimizes issues with being flagged as duplicate content.
| 6:32 pm on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
The 301 redirect needs to be site-wide, not just for the root.
| 10:10 pm on May 2, 2008 (gmt 0)|
agree with g1smd ;)
| 10:11 pm on May 2, 2008 (gmt 0)|
agree with g1smd ;)