graeme_p - 8:24 am on Mar 17, 2010 (gmt 0)
I got a great example of Wikipedia credulity in a discussion on Slashdot recently. Someone cited a Wikipedia article as proof, despite the fact that there was a verifiability (lack of) footnote about the very point they were trying to proove.
Mind you it was a discussion about religion, which is not a subject you can have a sensible discussion about on Slashdot anyway.
Bing endorsing Wikipedia articles are reference content will only make Wikipedia more credible- if people are sufficiently sceptical (very unlikely), it may make Bing less credible.