koan - 1:28 am on Dec 14, 2010 (gmt 0)
Yes, biased. Because you disagree with Wikileaks, you keep trying to blur the line between Wikileaks and Anonymous in an effort to tarnish their name. That's disingenuous. Examples:
(...) to these Wikileak fans.
Wikileak fans now target (...)
This Wikileaks fans are sure classy people (...)
the work of an 'Anonymous' sponsored conspiracy
Yet attacks on wikileaks site would be the work of a single individual with good intentions. You don't know that. Your conspiracy theories only targets Wikileaks, not the other side.
the work of one person protesting the release of stolen content
I agree two wrongs does not make a right, however, I never said Anonymous actions were right, I only explained the context.
Sure, DDOS is illegal but so is hosting stolen content.
I thought we just said... nevermind.