anon_e_moose - 9:07 pm on Nov 21, 2002 (gmt 0)

I bet there is more to the lawsuit than is discussed in those four or five paragraphs. As for the Macdonald's lawyer claiming it is frivolous, that is what makes me think there is probably some justification. The other lawyer would not take a class action suit without thinking there was a good chance of his wining.

How are you going to feel about it if it turns out that in addition to just soybean, (everyone already knows they put that in the meat), they are also adding all kind of goodies that make the food taste better for the sole purpose of increasing your appetite for it? Is this suit really that different than the ones against tobacco manufacturers?

I personally don't care. Go ahead and be all that you can be. I'm just saying that there is very likely more to the story than is being reported by people who make a living off of selling ads to Macdonalds.