Sally_Stitts - 9:31 pm on Jul 2, 2013 (gmt 0)
Different webmasters receive different parameters -
"Revenue optimization" (Rating=two blue dots) (went up from 1, I have no idea why)
--- Recommended ad formats = (NOT PRESENT FOR ME)
--- Text and Image Ads Enabled = (red exclamation point)
--- Crawler Errors = (green checkmark)
"Site health" (Rating=5 blue dots)
--- Page speed performance = (green checkmark)
"Google+" (Rating=5 blue dots)
--- +1 button added = (green checkmark)
--- +Page created = (NOT PRESENT FOR ME) (shown in Google example)
--- +Page badge implemented = (NOT PRESENT FOR ME) (shown in Google example)
Why are they inconsistent regarding the parameters displayed?
I certainly do not comply with - Recommended ad formats.
Shouldn't they be wailing on me for this? But, no entry.
How can we determine improved (green), or screwed up (yellow) if the parameter ISN'T SHOWN.
This begs the question, just HOW MANY parameters are there?
And what determines if they are addressed or not, FOR YOU?
If you are screwing up? No, it doesn't appear to be that.
If you are doing well? No, it doesn't appear to be that.
Can YOU mention a few parameters that you have seen, not mentioned here?
Maybe they should add -
--- You only have one ad per page, and
--- You have not purchased any AdWords