loanuniverse - 10:37 pm on Jul 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

So to recap:

The argument for these types of sites is that ROI is not really affected.

In the post above we have a testimonial that at least one advertiser's ROI was affected.

Hmmmm, what am I missing here?

/edit: Frankly the fact that the program is not being promoted as a free for all, and that EFV pointed out that the sites are against the TOS is like the atom-bomb of arguments. There really shouldn't be an argument at all.