Demaestro - 7:32 pm on May 28, 2010 (gmt 0)

If the objective had been to ensure the judge understood the consequences of any judgement handed down, then this action would have been legitimate. However, it doesn't sound like this is what they attempted to do.

How so? Are you guessing or is there something that actually suggests this to be true?

the site sure as heck profited from having that stuff on their site

A lot of people say this but Youtube has yet to post any profit. Yes they generate cash flow but the penny earned from someone watching a video is spend hosting it twice over.