penders - 10:42 pm on Jun 30, 2011 (gmt 0)
Yes the <dl> is the parent. But the way the design is structured with the <dt><dd><dd> always in a row, like so:
...kind of warrants some kind of additional container around each <dt><dd><dd> block in order to apply rocknbil's "shrink wrap" approach. Since the initial problem seemed to be that the <dt> wasn't clearing the preceeding <dd>. But such a container would obviously be invalid. So I was really questioning whether you could even apply the "shrink wrap" approach to such a structure? May be the <dl> element is the wrong tool to begin with?