bumpaw - 5:36 pm on May 30, 2004 (gmt 0)
Very Nice! I have a validation question though. For what little I have played with w3c validator the results were either Strict or Transitional. In this case it says valid XHTML 1.1 with no mention of strict or transitional. I guess it's the nature of 1.1. I've not gone there yet.