Bentler - 4:51 am on Jun 12, 2002 (gmt 0)

A year ago I rejected CSS positioning in favor of tables, partly because my logs showed Netscape 4.x was too common and partly because the layout was constrained by what CSS-P allowed. For example, I wanted a layout like:

HEADER--->
s¦liquid >
i¦content>
d¦liquid >
e¦content>
FOOTER--->

...but I couldn't solve the footer problem. However, just today I saw a link in 2 different threads to a site that appears to have the liquid footer positioning solved. I suspect this is a kluge, but it has me interested in taking a second look. Anyone here crack this nut?

[thenoodleincident.com...]