Page is a not externally linkable
outland88 - 9:11 pm on Jul 28, 2010 (gmt 0)
Wyweb the point I am getting at is people aren’t really reading the posts in this thread much less anywhere else. They’re more interested in espousing their opinion of what they think is right and wrong more than anything else.
If people had followed the few examples I have given in this thread it will show Google is allowing hundreds if not thousands of “content less” clones in direct violation of its own guidelines. Why because Google realized just like you, me, and everybody else they could make millions from a lot of Adsense schemes if they directly violated their guidelines. But on the other hand they want 99.9999% of the sheep to produce content. The simple reason why is Google knew many would soon follow suit with the same junk destroying the entire Internet. So who is anybody to condemn an affiliate or anything else when Google is blatantly violating their own guidelines.
Again when TriNorth asks why the profits continue to soar it’s never been a mystery to me.
In the case of the original poster who could he turn to? In over 50 dealings with Google every person I dealt with was from India, or surrounding areas, and barely understood English. In fact I’ve had to press a few at Google to finally admit where they were communicating from. That’s why Google is committed to form mail support and pointing you to links. Secondly as the mess unfolded the OP likely ran into simple fraud control. Google likely didn’t want anybody disallowing charges from a third party. To control any potential future abuse the head was severed.