Webwork - 4:16 pm on Sep 24, 2007 (gmt 0)

Until Google steps up to explain or respond it's not all bad to have some balance to the statements, interpretations and analysis applied to G's actions - such as EFV provides. Evidently G doesn't care to assign someone the task of responding in many of these thread and I can understand why - "big corporate" issues and all. In the void, left by their silence, I'm consistenly left with the impression that "if G was talking" they'd probably say something akin to what EFV has to offer.

Thanks, EFV, for taking the heat in many of the G threads and for transforming many threads/issues from a monologue - with no reply from G - to some degree of a rational dialogue. I wouldn't want to be in your shoes despite the value that your point-counterpoint approach brings to the analysis of G's actions. Kudos for doing a dirty job well.

Of course, EFV may be "out of a job" any time G chooses to step up and engage the day to day issues . . . ;)

[edited by: Webwork at 4:38 pm (utc) on Sep. 24, 2007]