Voxman - 5:23 pm on Jan 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

rbacal, me thinks you protest too much!

The goal was to warn and to tell others about our conclusions. Which is what we've done. You don't think our conclusions would hold up in a court of law ...fine. But know this. I have not put all our cards on the table as I've presented at our company board meeting. That document was more intensive and meant for internal use. This forum was not the place to post it. As I said, I had only to prove my findings to the board and not to anyone here. My attentions was to raise alarms and apparently I have. Others will not have to come to their own conclusions.
I will not reply, or respond to your posts on this matter anymore. You are a publisher so as far as I'm concerned we have nothing more to discuss.

That's not exactly holding the moral highground here is it?

If you are a publisher that takes the high road and toally white hat, I commend you, but no 'advertiser' who looks at the 'facts' as presented in our server logs and sales ROI figures are going to buy that the majority of the publishers are like you....again,..assuming you are as white hat and noble as your portray.

shorebreak, thank you very much for sharing in detail your findings and insights. It was helpful indeed to see a fresh look at the facts from 'different eyes'. Much appreciated that you took the time to post a response. We knew that others would also share the same conclusions after examining their own logs and ROI sheets. I look forward to reading more of your posts in the future.