shorebreak - 5:23 pm on Dec 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

Each week brings dozens of new articles on click fraud, all with different takes on its extent & Google's efforts in mitigating it; you've all seen this and you all have your own opinions.

FORGET CLICK FRAUD - IT'S NOT WHAT MATTERS

What the industry's not talking enough about is DISTRIBUTION FRAUD. Most call this 'search arbitrage', but that's not the right language; nor should we be implicitly condoning this fraud by calling it arbitrage. The practice of buying large numbers of AdWords ads (typically at very low CPC's) and sending those users to pages filled exclusively with search ads (whether from Google, Yahoo, Ask, SearchFeed/Miva or some other PPC firm) is nothing if not fraud.

Why? Simply because paid search ads are bought by advertisers with the explicit understanding that those ads will only be viewed as a *direct* result of a search performed on a search engine. Contrary to this understanding, Distribution Fraudsters are taking *search ad feeds* (as distinct from contextual ad feeds) and showing them on domains whose sole purpose is to receive low-CPC clicks from Google AdWords and provide no option to the user but to click on a high-CPC *search ad* within the site.

Secondarily, it's correct to call this Distribution Fraud rather than Search Arbitrage because this practice goes against the T's & C's of AdSense.

There's a great, great video on YouTube that thoroughly covers this and which I recommend people view and share.

[youtube.com...]

You all know about search arbitrage, but my point in saying all this is that we in the SEM world need to start calling it by its true name - distribution fraud. It's one thing for the search engines to condone 'search arbitrage' - whose very name implies people just trying to make an honest middleman living - and wholly another for them to condone fraud.

-Shorebreak

[edited by: encyclo at 2:08 am (utc) on Dec. 16, 2006]
[edit reason] added link [/edit]