pageoneresults - 2:27 pm on Feb 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

Nice post Page.

Thank you!

I am going to disagree here and point out a few things, if anything, because that read went down like warm milk with butter and honey.

Hmmm, I'm thinking about that one...

The document reads much more like a definite guide to html and elements that it does as the Ultimate SEO Guide to html.

Yes, I'll agree, it "would" read that way to someone not familiar with the finer intricacies of document structure. :)

Unfortunately, I would have to say that it plays a relatively small part in what we would deem 'effective SEO' today.

Ya, zeus already confirmed that SEO is Dead or almost dead anyway.

<Feel free to present arguments here>

Hmmm, I thought that is what this topic is all about? Plus I have a load of others that I can refer you to.

In fact, at the moment, I see website layout with the proper inbounds trumping on-page "anything" including proper use of elements.

Ya, we know given the proper circumstances that links can trump on page anything. But, what if you were to take the links and then add all this Micro SEO? What happens then?

Feel free share your thoughts...

Heh, you should know better than to bait me with a closing line like that! I think you know by know that I WILL share my thoughts.

I'm going to approach this topic from the premise that SEO is Dead as both you and zeus have claimed. Are there any others who wish to jump on the SEO is Dead Bandwagon? I know we have names like Dvorak, that Jason guy, etc. We'll just keep adding names to the list as they chime in here. :)

By the way, the SEO IS DEAD topic is over here...

S E O is D E A D
[webmasterworld.com...]