lavazza - 10:11 pm on Jun 1, 2010 (gmt 0)
This is both fallacious [skepticwiki.org] and irrelevant
You cannot prove a negative.
since you are making the claim that WWB and DW produce junk code, then it is up to you to prove that they do.
I use Dreamweaver predominantly ...
What useless code is giving you the problems?
One look at the source code of adobe.com [adobe.com] ought to answer your question<snip/>
you can dive into the generated code all you wish.
Looking at the source code behind the WYISWYG Web Builder's own site, I'd be surprised if anyone can hold their breath long enough to identify (let alone fix) that tangled mess
So... we have proof that both DW and WWB can and do generate spurious, awkward code
I am merely asking for evidence that DW (and, if you like, WWB) can be and are used to generate clean, efficient code