lavazza - 8:47 pm on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

If the generated site passes the Wc3 compatibility test and works in every tested browser, WHO CARES what the underlying code looks like?

And when it does NOT pass?

5 errors found while checking wysiwygwebbuilder.com/add_images.html [validator.w3.org]

the shortcut that WYSIWYG programs provide.

Advocating a reliance on so-called WYSIWYGs is short-sighted; Those who don't know how to write code are unable to fix it when (not if) it breaks

Why should I spend hundreds of dollars and tons of unproductive time just to satisfy the ego of the "real" programmers?

I have no idea why you ask this question

What's wrong with using a free text editor and investing your time to develop skills that will satisfy the wants and needs of a diverse range of visitors to your sites, both now and in the future?

Seriously, If I want to add a new page with a demo video and a few paragraphs of editorial on my site with a few links, I can do it in WWB in less than five minutes. How long would that take in your favorite HTML editor

About the same amount of time... and my code will work - as intended - on ALL media types...