europeforvisitors - 3:06 pm on Sep 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

content is meaningless. can be anything. what is the content of flicker? what is the content of google maps?

Sure, and while you're at it, why not say there's no difference between THE NEW YORK TIMES and a free weekly shopping newspaper? Or between KING KONG and your home video of a chimp at the zoo?

If content were "meaningless," search engines like Google wouldn't spend millions to index it, advertisers wouldn't spend billions to be associated with it, and Web entrepreneurs wouldn't be desperately in search of ways to get it on the cheap.