Page is a not externally linkable
NetGrease - 1:12 pm on Jan 21, 2002 (gmt 0)
I agree, this merger has the potential to be the single-most important decision AOL could ever make - and I think they know it; They certainly don't; I'm just as pleased as everyone else that AOL have left WinAmp and ODP virtually untouched, and more importantly still free. I don't think AOL would be so stupid as to rebrand the entire RedHat franchise lock, stock and barrel for their own purposes. I think they'd build on the strong foundation; still sell the more powerful distributions untouched, but give away an AOL-enhanced version of a super-quick home user workstation/Internet browser OS; Exactly my thinking with the above dedicated workstation/Internet distro; two install options 1)idiot proof, and 2)experienced user. And I don't think the "MS Bundled Browser" monster would raise its ugly head for AOL - the whole damned lot is FREE, and you could always bundle RedHat/AOL with a selection of other browsers on the CD (plus a tonne of other top free apps). I'd definately be interested if AOL gave me an OS on one of their coasters, instead of just a browser. ;) This frightens me to be honest. I've actually severed all my ties to MS now (bar OS), since they decided to create a monster out of the Passport system. If they could create a decent system bundle for e.g. under £300, they'd make a killing. I'm for the merger, but only if AOL respect the RedHat brand, and leave it largely untouched (except for a dedicated Harry Homeowner AOL/RedHat distribution). If they were to do this, they'd certainly get my support as a web developer/technophile.
Brett_Tabke wrote:
...they can have it for free and custom tailored to their hardware. They can preinstall it with all the custom icons and logo's they want. littleman wrote:
AOL doesn't always ruin what it touches, winamp and the ODP still have quality. John316 wrote:
And (Joes) would never "download the most recent distro and compile the neccesary binaries"..they like to use *installers* i.e. click here to make this thing work. Brett_Tabke wrote:
Who is to say that Windows 2005 won't REQUIRE you to be an MSN subscriber? NFFC wrote:
If you can cut MS, Intel and Dell out of the deal you could almost give the hardware away for free.