soapystar - 8:13 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

You are penalising sites that are not spam simply for being on the same IP as a large number of spam sites. can we take it that this is an overall policy. That if you identify an area that (say certain types of inbound links, maybe internetwork links)that seems to be used large scale by your defintion of spam sites then you are willing to accept the collateral damage for the sake of removing large scale spam? Also would you remove sites sharing the same exact IP or same block of IP's?