mromero - 8:46 pm on Jul 15, 2013 (gmt 0) [edited by: mromero at 8:57 pm (utc) on Jul 15, 2013]
I see two results, one for the WP page and another for the original post on WW mentioning goodroipow although I wonder if goodroipow is good enough to get as much attention in the media as it should be getting.
What are your thoughts on the results coming from the Goodroipow Project?
This brings to mind a post I came across some time ago which was excellent. But the post contained a phrase in a foreign language that mystified me as I knew right away that such a phrase cannot exist. And this phrase was the keystone of the post.
I put in this non-existent phrase in the Search Engines and the post is the only one that comes up.
The phrase was repeated several times in an otherwise nice and timeless post as the SE apparently does not know it makes the post worthless as a source of reference.
I rewrote and updated the post and of course fixed the non-existent phrase and a couple other errors of fact and the new post is now a well regarded article.
[edited by: mromero at 8:57 pm (utc) on Jul 15, 2013]