ColourOfSpring - 7:04 pm on May 27, 2013 (gmt 0) [edited by: ColourOfSpring at 7:22 pm (utc) on May 27, 2013]
First you suggest that all that stuff is evidence and cannot simply be wild coincidence and then you say none of it proves anything.
What you mean to say... you do not have the expertise to determine what is and what is not evidence and all the other references that are suggestive facts are not immediately available to you thus that is why you cannot conclusive prove anything to a preponderance of evidence which is all that is needed to file a suit of this nature.
Edit: I'm just commenting on what I - and many other website developers and clients of website developers have observed.
[edited by: ColourOfSpring at 7:22 pm (utc) on May 27, 2013]