Whitey - 12:54 am on May 27, 2013 (gmt 0) [edited by: Whitey at 1:10 am (utc) on May 27, 2013]
Here it is. Exactly
In massive verticals I watch the low hanging fruit for entry is long denied and tightening further. Not sure which one's you focus on, but you may still see some opportunity left there. Maybe some verticals were less effected by Pengiun 2.0 than others, because there weren't the brands to surface above them.
I do sense some quality link freshness has played a part as well - perhaps in the overall link graph/and build rate. Some folks resting on their older success' have slipped several slots.
The reason, I'm persisting with my stance on Penguin, is that I think the direction of this update is only a band aid solution to a much bigger problem for Google - but that's on another thread.
Was internal linking ever an issue with Penguin 1.0, and has that been part of this update - anyone?
[edited by: Whitey at 1:10 am (utc) on May 27, 2013]