errorsamac - 11:31 pm on Apr 2, 2013 (gmt 0)
I do agree that the loss of links has caused the drop in traffic. I guess my question is, when the site was first penalized, it was receiving 400 visitors/day from Google. Why did I spend the last year getting links removed if it wouldn't increase the traffic to my website? Wouldn't I have been better off to just "live with" the penalty? I'm just struggling to see the benefit (for the site owner) of trying to recover from an unnatural links penalty.
Has anyone else had an unnatural link penalty revoked which resulted in a benefit (increased traffic or some other benefit) for the site?