---- Big brands do not have the upper hand - Matt Cutts
Ersebet - 3:30 am on Apr 14, 2013 (gmt 0)
You have lot time, do not read carefully what say and use many logical fallacies. I have job and family.
But theory useless. Theory be tested in serp and google can know what serp more profitable, very fast and change to maksimize profit.
Please cite a source.
I'd love to be able to review your reference for the theory being tested and Google adjusting the SERPs in an effort to make more money. Thanks!
I cannot cite source for what Google can do by test serps. Easy done: serp one this many ad click, serp 2 this many ad click, serps 3 this many ad click.
I would be out of work if I couldn't increase ranking without increasing spending on advertising, but I'm not out of work by any stretch of the imagination. But it's not easy either.
Even if all true (maybe false or u advertise ur service) is anecdotal evidence [yourlogicalfallacyis.com...] . And you use [en.wikipedia.org...] . No one said that every1 on top 10 has to buy adwords. I say before "Google no manipulate of site 2 site basis (you buy ad today, organic traffic up tomorrow) but broad term." No argue more, useless and irritating. This truth, not insult.