TheOptimizationIdiot - 10:19 pm on Apr 13, 2013 (gmt 0)
I'm not attacking you. I'm asking for clarification. In one place you've said my posts ramble and make no sense, yet in another you say you understand them clearly.
If you really have the grasp of the English language you claim to you would know how incorrect your grammar and use of English is, not mine. Sorry to be the one to tell you, but you really do not understand or use English as well as you think you do. English is very difficult to understand and use, and I get that, but please, do not think my posts ramble or make no sense to people who really understand the language.
Your posts indicate you do not have a great grasp of English, but I welcome them and have not once even implied or said for you to stop posting. Not even close. I have simply asked you stop talking about mine and to stop telling my I should quit posting.
I have also said if you really don't understand my posts or think they are rambling, then you should stop reading them. There's a big difference between saying "ignore me" and telling someone to stop posting.
Maybe read more, post less?
Once again you're suggesting I not post, even though you've claimed not to do that.
Maybe older member remember you
Maybe they do. I've been a member here for almost 10 years and have been complimented and thanked for my explanations more than once by more than one member. In nearly a decade and over 5,000 posts I've made you're the first who's ever suggested I not continue posting.
Panda only last month added to normal algo. But when introduced huge penalty to webmaster and big increase in Google earning.
Check the posts here from when they integrated it into the main algo. Many said they could not even tell anything happened. The source article you cited is from July 2011. Nearly two years out of date for this thread.
The article cited does not even come close to confirming what you say. It's pure speculation, noted and worded as such throughout the article. (Sensationalism gets read and is great "link bait", so you often have to read exactly what is said to tell the difference between speculation and fact, especially when it comes to optimization. The article cited is worded as speculation. None of it, even with the updates made since, is reported/worded as fact. It's all complete speculation, which may or may not be accurate.)
The posts here from the update thread when Panda was integrated do not back up that speculation either. Many wondered if anything had even happened or changed when Panda was even integrated into the algo, which indicates there was no "large, profit increasing, everything changed" update.
Sorry, but you're incorrect in your conclusions and statements according to the reports and observations made by a number of members here.