Martin_Ice_Web - 8:36 am on Mar 5, 2013 (gmt 0)
tedster, thanx, thats what i meant. Although i donīt catch it why g* downgrades a whole dynamic DNS provider? DOnīt they have the power or are there really most of them spammy and harmfull pages? To mayn pages to compile? to expensive in regard to quality? I know that many Security/virus scanners are doing it the same way.
In 12/2012 i began not to link my PDF files dirct do a dynamic host but to do it by rewriting it with php. I saw a siginificant jump the next panda update. But i donīt know how long g* will look back at page history to evaluate trust? And, will g* be able to loop back the php rewrite?
@claaarky, now the point is to know how g* measures utility ( your favourised users stats like pages views, bounce rate )? or are they able to calculate a pages usability by comparing it with templates?