Whitey - 12:31 am on Oct 11, 2012 (gmt 0)
@MrSavage - can you confirm this. You talk about possibly thin content and one of many sites. It kinda sounds like you were in the above category.
Regarding this topic. @Whitey I'm not really sure your question exactly. Can you clarify? I'm a bit confused.
I was questioning the page quality strength [UI / content] on these sites to give me a hunch about how priority weightings might have been applied.
It would provide some insight into what high level algo changes against site features occurred, how they are prioritised, and the sequence of Google applying them.
Apologies if I wasn't clear. So again, did you feel these sites were thin content content, and not particularily deep in terms of URL's?