Leosghost - 5:27 pm on Oct 3, 2012 (gmt 0)

they are concurrent updates..they are not the same update..nor are they parts of the same update..
Thus .I'm not assuming anything..merely trying to keep threads coherent / making sense..
for example..

The question if your EMD is down, is it gone from images also?

Doesn't make any sense at all as a sentence..

One's EMD may be down..but one's EMD cannot be gone from images..

Unless what you meant to say was..

If your EMD is down ( fallen in position in standard SERPs )for it's KW(s)..has it's position also fallen in image search SERPs for images which are on that domain and previously ranked highly..?

The problem about dealing with both those things ( EMDs and Images ) in one thread is ..an EMD very rarely has all of it's images also with a KW exact match to the domain name in their titles..

Also the main reason for falls in image search is "attribution"..or "dupes"..EMDs may be a factor in some peoples falls in image search, but you can't discuss every factor that you think might be in play, simultaneously in every post in every thread..

That results in cacaphony..[sic]<=faite exprès..;)

Google isn't attributing anyone's EMD to another domain..:) It has merely decided that it doesn't like them..either entirely..or for certain keywords..frequently those in the EMD name..