JamesMacf - 6:35 pm on Sep 30, 2012 (gmt 0) [edited by: Robert_Charlton at 10:30 pm (utc) on Sep 30, 2012]
@Leosghost - Thank you for taking the time to reply :). We actually recently underwent a redesign of our network with [this site] being the first. By the end of the year we will have launched [two others]. We added much more image heavy experience, dynamic navigation and strong cross branding - we also revamped a lot of the weaker pages on our website. These changes culminated in a much higher time on site, return visitors and page views per person
Our current USP's are creating niche sites on premium domains which cover complete content - we are still a relatively new company and I will admit we have a lot to learn. That said we always focus on quality content from authentic providers, <experts in the field>. We have already managed to do this with our <related> site which is the largest in the UK and we are in fact launching a book in the next month with one of the UK's largest publishers.
I think there are always elements to our network we can improve and the moment we become complacent is the moment we start going out of business. I do feel like specific.tld was hit unfairly with the update as we didn't just take a knock we literally don't rank for anything (not in top 100) anymore.
The only option we have really is to sink more money into the site to try and fix what might have gone wrong.
Mod's note: specific.tld... a .co.uk single keyword EMD... should not have been mentioned publicly, and I am removing the name from the thread. It's leading to a public site review, which is against our forum guidelines and WebmasterWorld's TOS.
[edited by: tedster at 6:53 pm (utc) on Sep 30, 2012]
[edited by: JamesMacf at 7:07 pm (utc) on Sep 30, 2012]
[edit reason] removed specifics [/edit]
[edited by: Robert_Charlton at 10:30 pm (utc) on Sep 30, 2012]