Page is a not externally linkable
- Google
-- Google SEO News and Discussion
---- Backlinks - Are these factors really a matter of concern?


goodroi - 6:28 pm on Sep 13, 2012 (gmt 0)


IMHO

1.Relevancy - Always good to get links from relevant websites.

2.Domain Age - Not really important, I prefer established sites because they tend to be less likely to go out of business and I like when my links stay alive for a good long time.

3.Google PR - Public only sees toolbar pagerank which is not the same as real PR and has many accuracy issues. Still TBPR is an easy and fast albeit inaccurate way of judging a website.

4.IP Location - Don't really care myself. If two powerful & relevant sites are on the same ip I still want links from both sites.

5.Quality of Content - I don't specifically judge content but I do avoid sites with poor experiences they are more likely to be spammy sites that get shut down.

6.User Experience - If they have a good user experience they are more likely to have real traffic and that means my link has a higher chance of getting clicked on by visitors to their site.

7.No of daily visits - More visits means more chance I get traffic from the backlink making me less dependent on Google which is a good thing.

8.No of OBLs from the page where I get a link from - Generally high amount of outbound links means it is a cheap link farm to be avoided. I can think of exceptions like a quality newspaper article on the top gadgets for the holidays and it linking out to many different store sites.

9.No of pages indexed - Personally I don't really care. Some sites have published few pages so they have low pages indexed, other site have glitches with their CMS which artificially inflates the count of pages indexed.


Thread source:: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4494124.htm
Brought to you by WebmasterWorld: http://www.webmasterworld.com