enigma1 - 10:36 am on Mar 30, 2012 (gmt 0) [edited by: tedster at 11:43 am (utc) on Mar 30, 2012]
After reading more about it, the ftp is documented here:
Let alone the weaknesses that's not a good approach for the ftp issue as far I can see the virtual hosts workaround for ftp is still on draft.
So even if someone wanted he could not setup the ftp to deal with different domains on the same physical resources via ftp, serving content to spiders. Not reliably at least. Google should know something like this may cause security problems at this time and limit it to sites who submit specific port details via their accounts.
[edit reason] make first link active [/edit]
[edited by: tedster at 11:43 am (utc) on Mar 30, 2012]