Leosghost - 4:02 pm on Oct 24, 2011 (gmt 0) [edited by: Leosghost at 4:20 pm (utc) on Oct 24, 2011]
my apologies indyank..:) should have said "most"
aahh ..just realised ..I think you mean they didn't mention "Panda"..My point is that down the years when I or others have criticised Google for privacy issues , the "books" thing , copyright etc ..we've been pretty much told that Google were great, by people who were only interested that the adsense checks kept rolling in...
Now that they are are not doing so well due to Panda ( and in spite of what some of them claim, if they are doing OK? then why only speak up about Google's practices now )..they are in every thread, and especially the Panda ones, but the sense of "jilted" bile is common to all their posts, even when panda is not actually mentioned..( I should have said "their usual rants against Google, since Panda .in which they do not always mention the word Panda" ) that describes a lot of posts since feb 2011 here, more accurately..
Google has always been fickle ..but many were so busy counting the adsense money that they didn't want to hear.
[edited by: Leosghost at 4:20 pm (utc) on Oct 24, 2011]