walkman - 5:06 am on Jul 13, 2011 (gmt 0) [edited by: walkman at 5:17 am (utc) on Jul 13, 2011]
Shatner and whatson,
the theme here seems to be that sites still suck that's why they have not come back. And any changes /improvements are worse that's why sites keep dropping and dropping.
I've been questioning this wisdom and mentioning even a set time penalty (Google decides when) but eventually you give up. I find it odd that in 5 months we haven't seen lots and lots of sites come back. It can't be quality, we see the crap that's ranking in many niches.
I hope you have your asbestos underwear on, you will be taken to task for suggesting Google doesn't care about the average webmaster. It's sacrilege, look here [webmasterworld.com...]
To us this may seem horribly unjust -- our sites have been sentenced to a slow, painful death with no appeal -- but to Google it's just a numbers game
[edited by: walkman at 5:17 am (utc) on Jul 13, 2011]