pageoneresults - 11:27 am on Feb 13, 2011 (gmt 0)

I wonder how many customers the search firm for JCP is going to get out of this. With that link to their site on page 2 of the NYT article, they've got to be sitting back laughing all the way to the bank.

[SEO] does not engage in or do business with companies that engage in any tactics that may cause a loss in effectiveness of search results, or in any methods that may cause a negative effect on search engine operations.

I had to laugh after reading JCP's search firm's website.

59 terms? Pffft, and that is newsworthy?

And how does NYT know that they were paid for by JCP? I could have easily pointed all those links at JCP and caused this. You could have too. ;)