MrFewkes - 6:35 pm on Feb 7, 2011 (gmt 0) [edited by: MrFewkes at 7:13 pm (utc) on Feb 7, 2011]
Its a total doddle to sort out the junk - theres no argument at all programming wise. Its easy - data volumes mean nothing - permutations do - and there are not that many - maybe a couple of hundred thousand tops.
I am not needed at google to do this - (as one person said they would give me a 6 figure sum :) )
No - google cannot get rid of the problem because of the revenue - thats nothing to do with expertise. They HAVE to keep the bathwater and the baby - because they need the money from the bathwater - irrespective of whether or not they get more from adwords.
I am afraid - that I may have been misunderstood - my solution should I be working at google - would cost google money - but would improve what users get to see.
[edited by: MrFewkes at 7:13 pm (utc) on Feb 7, 2011]