scottsonline - 5:17 am on Oct 23, 2010 (gmt 0)
Robert that's what it is coming to. I am more apt to print to PDF at this point.
Tedster I'd normally agree with your assesment but can't. The reason being for all of these searches it's not a matter of relevant site (mine) being replaced by another. A year ago there would be ten to twenty good results for the most obscure product. Now those same searches may return no relevant pages or only a few. Whatever mating google is doing is broken which explains why we cannot find what we once could using plain phrases because the value of those phrases has changed in google.
A year ago a medical search would return the mayoclinic often. They appear to be ou of the google business as I never see them. When did wikipedia become the defacto source for medical information and amazon the defacto source of a product via resellers.
We should probably discuss proper coding form bookmark buttons as I think we will all need them.