This ignores the basic premise of Nash equlibrium [en.wikipedia.org] of any game theory matrix
And quite honestly, no offense, a very naive worldview.
One must ASSUME every person, corporation, country is always working SOLELY in their best interests. And looking to IMPROVE their position regardless of the other players.
(hence, MY worldview about Gorg since Day 1)
The only time a player doesn't act to IMPROVE their position within game matrices is if they see/understand that any actions to improve will likely result in an actual DECREASE in position, as the other players act/react to the original players movement.(seeking to increase THEIR position)
(Think 2 master martial artists simply waiting for the other one to make the first move to expose a weakness. Now think 100+ masters with various agendas fighting for motivations.)
Gorg has to be "CONVINCED" that seeking to improve their position will, in fact, have a greater probability/possibility of decreasing their position in the game theory matrices.
Hence, those individuals (companies, countries, etc) that are acting in "responsible ways" are, in truth, ONLY acting that way out of self-interest ultimately.
IE. One is acting out of selflessness cause at the end of the day they think it will benefit them. lol think about that paradox!