Page is a not externally linkable
whitenight - 10:03 pm on Oct 31, 2008 (gmt 0)
It's mentioned earlier in the thread by me, tedster, and Cain. It's hard to explain without rehashing all my rants about how the Position #6 [webmasterworld.com] roll out originally
whitenight thats for remaining cool-headed about it. but what exactly in the nature of last year's 950 penalty that happened around this time in 2007 reminds you of this one?
I think we were also the main 3 who followed, noticed, and/or correctly diagnosed the Position #6 issue last year [webmasterworld.com].
We all also noticed that this rollout has been remarkably similar
(even to the "authority" sites being affected most)
(which I'm sure tedster is tired off) =P