<moved from another location>
Dynamic URLs vs. static URLs
This coming from Google? Wow, I'm really confused. But, I know I will never serve your bot or any other bot a query string like you are suggesting. What exactly did ya'll do over there? What are we missing here. Forget about the search engines for a moment, what about all the other reasons we may want a static looking URI over a dynamic one?
Are you really that confident in your crawler's capabilities? I'm not, and I believe I have the support of many others when saying that we will not change what we've been doing for years just because you think you can crawl dynamic query strings more efficiently than rewritten ones.
[edited by: Robert_Charlton at 4:48 am (utc) on Sep. 23, 2008]
[edit reason] spliced post onto thread [/edit]