steveb - 7:05 am on Apr 25, 2006 (gmt 0)

I'm not getting what you aren't getting as again the idea is blatantly unfair.

If you are simply suggesting a manual review of a new domain to see if it can avoid the sandbox, well that would be nice (good luck), but what you stated is just a way for one type of site (and business model) to have an advantage over two others. Seriously, what positive can you possibly see in that? Why, exactly, should two types of exactly peer sites not have the same benefits of one type of site?