reseller - 10:19 pm on Jul 11, 2007 (gmt 0)

EFV

..and having paid evaluators to help identify spam, distinguish between good and bad results, etc. should improve Google's search results over the long term--regardless of where they're being recruited, how much they're being paid,

Its not only how much they are being paid which worry me. Its a statement like this one [webmasterworld.com] too:

"they pay around $12 - $15 an hour, work from home, part time, no benefits. the people are not highly specialized, just trained to look for obvious problems, and rate sites."

Would any site owner and webmaster feel comfortable knowing that such kind of $12 - $15 evaluators might affect directly or indirectly which site to stay and which site to be deindexed on Google index?