tedster - 4:32 pm on May 11, 2007 (gmt 0)

That patent does not reduce to a simple set of "rules". And there's not enough detail in it to get precise numbers or advice -- and there are too many areas being measured, on-page and off-page. Plus, we aren't even sure that this patent really IS the culprit. There's just a circumstantial case for it.

Thus annej's comment "we are shooting at dusk".