Page is a not externally linkable
- Google
-- Google SEO News and Discussion
---- Duplicate Content - part 2


photopassjapan - 12:44 pm on Nov 17, 2006 (gmt 0)


We finally got our first faulty link ;)

Although not a 302 redirect, just someone copy pasting a URL with an anchor in it as the link to our site. The fun thing is that they use the link to the paragraph on the page that tells how to link to us PROPERLY :D ... with four versions and even the CODE shown in textfields to make extra sure. Aaaagh... okay.

You know... example.com/page.html#whatever

Since the site has internal links pointing to this page in both ways page.html and page.html#whatever, and only page.html has a cache, backlinks ( and both show the same TBPR ), i concluded that G can tell that there's just no difference, does not even index the anchored URL, let alone compare the two and think to itself that it's duplicate content. Which makes sense for it would then have to penalize half of the net, so...

So this can't hurt us.

...

...

...

...( waiting for people to raise their voices )...

...?

Or am i gravely mistaken with this <:D


Thread source:: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3175447.htm
Brought to you by WebmasterWorld: http://www.webmasterworld.com